Author josh.r
Recipients BNMetrics, gvanrossum, josh.r, pablogsal, pekka.klarck, xtreak
Date 2018-11-07.22:11:53
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <>
Keep in mind, had this guarantee been in place in 3.4, the improvement in 3.5 couldn't have been made, and issue17936 might have been closed and never addressed, even once dicts were ordered, simply because we never rechecked it. It makes the whole "potential downside" more obvious, because we would have paid that price not so long ago. Knowing that 3.5 improved by breaking this guarantee was part of what made me cautious here.
Date User Action Args
2018-11-07 22:11:53josh.rsetrecipients: + josh.r, gvanrossum, pekka.klarck, pablogsal, xtreak, BNMetrics
2018-11-07 22:11:53josh.rsetmessageid: <>
2018-11-07 22:11:53josh.rlinkissue34805 messages
2018-11-07 22:11:53josh.rcreate