This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author vstinner
Recipients methane, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner
Date 2018-10-24.12:19:05
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1540383545.33.0.788709270274.issue35053@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
A little bit of history.

I opened a bug 2 years ago but I closed it (lack of interest):
https://github.com/vstinner/pytracemalloc/issues/2

I rewrote tracemalloc between version 0.9 and 1.0. In tracemalloc 0.9, there was an API to track free lists. Here is the code to handle "alloc" and "free" of an object inside a freelist:

https://github.com/vstinner/pytracemalloc/blob/a2b2616fc73cd5ce0ea45d1b68a490e0fc52ccc8/_tracemalloc.c#L291-L337

My PR 10063 has a more correct and efficient implementation:

* It keeps the trace alive when the object moves into the free list to report the real memory usage of Python: the free lists consumes memory
* It writes directly into the hash table entry rather than remove/add frequently the trace, it should be more efficient
History
Date User Action Args
2018-10-24 12:19:05vstinnersetrecipients: + vstinner, methane, serhiy.storchaka
2018-10-24 12:19:05vstinnersetmessageid: <1540383545.33.0.788709270274.issue35053@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2018-10-24 12:19:05vstinnerlinkissue35053 messages
2018-10-24 12:19:05vstinnercreate