Author thautwarm
Recipients benjamin.peterson, brett.cannon, gvanrossum, nascheme, ncoghlan, serhiy.storchaka, thautwarm, vstinner, yselivanov
Date 2018-09-22.05:40:07
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <>
I'm in favor of this idea for prospective extensions that could be implemented through this brand-new ast.Constant.  

Actually I used to expect a more general ast.Constant when I was manipulating ASTs half a year ago, at that time my job is to make staging functions that take some user-defined types as constants(in these scenes, these types are definitely immutable and permanent) to gain performance improvements and avoid redundant allocations, and what I exactly wanted is such an ast.Constant.
Date User Action Args
2018-09-22 05:40:07thautwarmsetrecipients: + thautwarm, gvanrossum, brett.cannon, nascheme, ncoghlan, vstinner, benjamin.peterson, serhiy.storchaka, yselivanov
2018-09-22 05:40:07thautwarmsetmessageid: <>
2018-09-22 05:40:07thautwarmlinkissue32892 messages
2018-09-22 05:40:07thautwarmcreate