Message326078
I'm in favor of this idea for prospective extensions that could be implemented through this brand-new ast.Constant.
Actually I used to expect a more general ast.Constant when I was manipulating ASTs half a year ago, at that time my job is to make staging functions that take some user-defined types as constants(in these scenes, these types are definitely immutable and permanent) to gain performance improvements and avoid redundant allocations, and what I exactly wanted is such an ast.Constant. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2018-09-22 05:40:07 | thautwarm | set | recipients:
+ thautwarm, gvanrossum, brett.cannon, nascheme, ncoghlan, vstinner, benjamin.peterson, serhiy.storchaka, yselivanov |
2018-09-22 05:40:07 | thautwarm | set | messageid: <1537594807.49.0.956365154283.issue32892@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2018-09-22 05:40:07 | thautwarm | link | issue32892 messages |
2018-09-22 05:40:07 | thautwarm | create | |
|