This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author vstinner
Recipients gregory.p.smith, pablogsal, ronaldoussoren, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner
Date 2018-09-18.13:54:55
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1537278895.99.0.956365154283.issue34663@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Serhiy Storchaka: "If this is an optimization, what is the downside of always using vfork()?"

I don't know the vfork() function, but you can find articles like:
"vfork considered dangerous" (old article of 2012)
https://ewontfix.com/7/

But it's unclear to me if vfork() drawbacks also affect posix_spawn(). posix_spawn() is well defined: call vfork() and then immediately exec().

Another article:

"First is that vfork pauses the parent thread while the child executes and eventually calls an exec family function, this is a huge latency problem for applications."

https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2015/08/19/launching-helper-process-under-memory-and-latency-constraints-pthread_create-and-vfork/
History
Date User Action Args
2018-09-18 13:54:56vstinnersetrecipients: + vstinner, gregory.p.smith, ronaldoussoren, serhiy.storchaka, pablogsal
2018-09-18 13:54:55vstinnersetmessageid: <1537278895.99.0.956365154283.issue34663@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2018-09-18 13:54:55vstinnerlinkissue34663 messages
2018-09-18 13:54:55vstinnercreate