This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author terry.reedy
Recipients 25.45, rhettinger, terry.reedy, willingc
Date 2018-09-15.20:41:10
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1537044071.1.0.956365154283.issue34660@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
I am re-opening with the scope limited to source code that will not be part of a doc review.  The 2nd PR falls within this limit and I think it should be properly reviewed.

I am opposed to removing 'sanity check' as it has a well-enough defined meaning within programming that does not disparage the code author.  Indeed, sanity checks are often written and labelled as such by module authors.  PR9335 does not touch this phrase.

The other terms are more often applied to code by others, sometimes with a hint of disparagement of the author.
History
Date User Action Args
2018-09-15 20:41:11terry.reedysetrecipients: + terry.reedy, rhettinger, willingc, 25.45
2018-09-15 20:41:11terry.reedysetmessageid: <1537044071.1.0.956365154283.issue34660@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2018-09-15 20:41:11terry.reedylinkissue34660 messages
2018-09-15 20:41:10terry.reedycreate