Message324940
We definitely can't make that change to PyNumber_Divmod in 3.7 at this point, I'm sure someone somewhere is relying on being able to get arbitrary information out of their objects with `divmod(crazy_object)`. I don't know enough math to say whether there could be any legitimate mathematical use for arbitrary return values so I leave it to others to determine whether we could make that consider that change in 3.8 just to clean things up.
I've looked through _datetimemodule.c and I don't see how timedelta.__divmod__ could fail like this, since it actually creates new timedelta objects from its arguments to work from. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2018-09-10 17:54:46 | zach.ware | set | recipients:
+ zach.ware, mark.dickinson, serhiy.storchaka, Oren Milman |
2018-09-10 17:54:46 | zach.ware | set | messageid: <1536602086.84.0.56676864532.issue31577@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2018-09-10 17:54:46 | zach.ware | link | issue31577 messages |
2018-09-10 17:54:46 | zach.ware | create | |
|