➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author barry
Recipients barry, brett.cannon, eric.smith, girtsf
Date 2018-08-28.19:35:43
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1535484943.31.0.56676864532.issue34534@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
https://docs.python.org/3/reference/import.html#regular-packages

Regular packages have __init__.py files and namespace packages do not.  "Implicit non-namespace packages" aren't really A Thing.

This design choice is deliberate; namespace packages themselves have no physical location so there's no place to put resources within them.  Is there a problem with adding empty __init__.py files to regular packages with resources?
History
Date User Action Args
2018-08-28 19:35:43barrysetrecipients: + barry, brett.cannon, eric.smith, girtsf
2018-08-28 19:35:43barrysetmessageid: <1535484943.31.0.56676864532.issue34534@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2018-08-28 19:35:43barrylinkissue34534 messages
2018-08-28 19:35:43barrycreate