Message323571
I agree. We should definitely document it as a change, but I don't think there's anything useful you can do in the case of a flush failing anyway, so it seems unlikely that anyone could depend on the return value.
Returning None for success and exception on error sounds like a good change. Technically this is no longer returning zero, as previously documented, so if anyone wants to get *really* pedantic, we're not returning the "failed" result for success ;) |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2018-08-15 15:40:45 | steve.dower | set | recipients:
+ steve.dower, paul.moore, ishimoto, pitrou, ocean-city, schmir, tim.golden, zach.ware, serhiy.storchaka |
2018-08-15 15:40:45 | steve.dower | set | messageid: <1534347645.81.0.56676864532.issue2122@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2018-08-15 15:40:45 | steve.dower | link | issue2122 messages |
2018-08-15 15:40:45 | steve.dower | create | |
|