This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author ammar2
Recipients ammar2, giampaolo.rodola, jkloth, paul.moore, steve.dower, tim.golden, vstinner, zach.ware
Date 2018-07-18.17:26:41
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1531934801.23.0.56676864532.issue34060@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> But then again, if it's solely for our tests, perhaps the best way to approach this is to start a Python thread that periodically runs this command?

This sounds like a very good solution to me, it avoids adding the complexity of the C code. We actually have two options here, to keep the results consistent with the unix load, we can use `typeperf "\System\Processor Queue Length"`

To get cpu usage, we can use the command Victor posted. I'll make an alternative PR with that today just so we can contrast the two approaches.
History
Date User Action Args
2018-07-18 17:26:41ammar2setrecipients: + ammar2, paul.moore, vstinner, giampaolo.rodola, tim.golden, jkloth, zach.ware, steve.dower
2018-07-18 17:26:41ammar2setmessageid: <1531934801.23.0.56676864532.issue34060@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2018-07-18 17:26:41ammar2linkissue34060 messages
2018-07-18 17:26:41ammar2create