Message321384
Thinking about this some more, I'm inclined to go the same way we did with issue 33932: classify it as an outright regression, work out the desired requirements for a missing embedding test case, and then fix the implementation to pass the new test case.
My suggestion for test commands would be:
../Lib/site.py
-m site
-c 'import sys; print(sys.argv)' some test data here
Once those work properly, we'd consider the regression relative to Python 3.6 fixed.
Those could either be 3 different test cases, or else we could run them all within a single test case, with a Py_Initialize() call before each one (since Py_Main() calls Py_Finalize() internally). |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2018-07-10 12:51:40 | ncoghlan | set | recipients:
+ ncoghlan, belopolsky, vstinner, mcepl, eric.snow, emilyemorehouse, hroncok |
2018-07-10 12:51:40 | ncoghlan | set | messageid: <1531227100.55.0.56676864532.issue34008@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2018-07-10 12:51:40 | ncoghlan | link | issue34008 messages |
2018-07-10 12:51:40 | ncoghlan | create | |
|