This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author rkmountainguy
Recipients Arfrever, Tom Krauss, amaury.forgeotdarc, arigo, mark.dickinson, meador.inge, rkmountainguy, rutsky
Date 2018-07-04.14:47:28
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <>
I concur with rutsky.  Complex numbers are essential in the physical sciences, and the complex type is part of the c99 standard.  Trying to shoehorn complex support by a user-defined type makes use of the builtin methods for the standard complex type clunky.
Date User Action Args
2018-07-04 14:47:28rkmountainguysetrecipients: + rkmountainguy, arigo, amaury.forgeotdarc, mark.dickinson, Arfrever, meador.inge, rutsky, Tom Krauss
2018-07-04 14:47:28rkmountainguysetmessageid: <>
2018-07-04 14:47:28rkmountainguylinkissue16899 messages
2018-07-04 14:47:28rkmountainguycreate