Message 318409 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	vstinner
Recipients	davin, miss-islington, ned.deily, pitrou, vstinner
Date	2018-06-01.13:05:41
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1527858341.67.0.682650639539.issue33532@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
I saw one new test_ignore() failure on Travis CI in my 3.6 PR, whereas 3.6 already uses PIPE_MAX_SIZE for test_ignore(). https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/7315/ https://travis-ci.org/python/cpython/jobs/386637729 Hum, test_ignore() uses PIPE_MAX_SIZE, whereas the test fails on Linux where we use a pair of sockets, no pipes. Maybe we should use SOCK_MAX_SIZE? Notes on pipe size: * /proc/sys/fs/pipe-max-size * bpo-17835: add support.PIPE_MAX_SIZE (4 MiB +1 B) * bpo-18643: add support.SOCK_MAX_SIZE (16 MiB)

I saw one new test_ignore() failure on Travis CI in my 3.6 PR, whereas 3.6 already uses PIPE_MAX_SIZE for test_ignore().

https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/7315/
https://travis-ci.org/python/cpython/jobs/386637729

Hum, test_ignore() uses PIPE_MAX_SIZE, whereas the test fails on Linux where we use a pair of sockets, no pipes. Maybe we should use SOCK_MAX_SIZE?

Notes on pipe size:

* /proc/sys/fs/pipe-max-size
* bpo-17835: add support.PIPE_MAX_SIZE (4 MiB +1 B)
* bpo-18643: add support.SOCK_MAX_SIZE (16 MiB)

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2018-06-01 13:05:41	vstinner	set	recipients: + vstinner, pitrou, ned.deily, davin, miss-islington
2018-06-01 13:05:41	vstinner	set	messageid: <1527858341.67.0.682650639539.issue33532@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2018-06-01 13:05:41	vstinner	link	issue33532 messages
2018-06-01 13:05:41	vstinner	create