Author mfisher
Recipients mfisher, r.david.murray, rhettinger, ronaldoussoren, sahilmn
Date 2018-05-30.21:54:49
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1527717289.59.0.682650639539.issue33590@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> I did look at the code :-)

I also looked at the code.  I had to do so to understand why the example output was not "as expected."  ;)

> I don't agree about the example in the documentation, it is a clear
> demonstration about how to use the API in general and AFAIK is not
> intended to show how priorities work.

Although I came to the same conclusion as you regarding both the fact and the reason the output was correct, I respectfully disagree that the example is clear.  It is not.  Yes, the example, as written, is intended to demonstrate the API -- which consists of several functionalities *including priority*.  If this were not so, the example would not be passing different priority values with the same delay value.

I suggest re-opening this issue as a documentation bug and modifying the example to use enterabs instead of enter.

Respectfully,
M Fisher
History
Date User Action Args
2018-05-30 21:54:49mfishersetrecipients: + mfisher, rhettinger, ronaldoussoren, r.david.murray, sahilmn
2018-05-30 21:54:49mfishersetmessageid: <1527717289.59.0.682650639539.issue33590@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2018-05-30 21:54:49mfisherlinkissue33590 messages
2018-05-30 21:54:49mfishercreate