Message317685
That is not kwargs, that's a passing a dict. Which is what you would want, since the strings you want to replace might not be valid identifiers, and so couldn't be passed as keyword arguments.
I think I'm -0.5 on this. I don't think complicating the api is worth the benefit, given that you can already chain replace calls. (And note that before dicts became ordered by language definition this would have been a non-starter, which is probably also a mark against it.) |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2018-05-25 16:04:33 | r.david.murray | set | recipients:
+ r.david.murray, eitan.adler, paalped |
2018-05-25 16:04:33 | r.david.murray | set | messageid: <1527264273.35.0.682650639539.issue33647@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2018-05-25 16:04:33 | r.david.murray | link | issue33647 messages |
2018-05-25 16:04:33 | r.david.murray | create | |
|