Message316644
With the recent (and ongoing) change to string annotations, it's no longer obvious what the type of a field is (normal, ClassVar, or InitVar).
I propose exposing the heretofore undocumented _field_type to the repr. Instead of writing it directly, I'm going to make it say one of:
_field_type=_FIELD
_field_type=_FIELD_CLASSVAR
_field_type=_FIELD_INITVAR
This is because it's an object reference, and would otherwise look like:
_field_type=<object object at 0x10cc5f1f0>
Which is all but useless. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2018-05-15 12:01:17 | eric.smith | set | recipients:
+ eric.smith, ned.deily |
2018-05-15 12:01:16 | eric.smith | set | messageid: <1526385676.97.0.682650639539.issue33517@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2018-05-15 12:01:16 | eric.smith | link | issue33517 messages |
2018-05-15 12:01:16 | eric.smith | create | |
|