Message314397
There's nothing in the docs I can see that implies `sample(x, n)` is a prefix of what `sample(x, n+1)` would have returned had the latter been called instead. If so, then - as always - it's "at your own risk" when you rely on behaviors that haven't been specified. Since the universe of _possible_ behaviors that haven't been specified is immense, I'd rather we didn't even start to list all of them ;-)
Seriously, when the docs don't promise something, it's usually a mistake to assume they just forgot to mention it. I'd leave the docs alone in this case. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2018-03-25 06:05:09 | tim.peters | set | recipients:
+ tim.peters, rhettinger, docs@python, Scott Eilerman |
2018-03-25 06:05:09 | tim.peters | set | messageid: <1521957909.56.0.467229070634.issue33114@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2018-03-25 06:05:09 | tim.peters | link | issue33114 messages |
2018-03-25 06:05:07 | tim.peters | create | |
|