Author gvanrossum
Recipients Nofar Schnider, gvanrossum, mark.dickinson, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, tim.peters
Date 2018-03-13.23:43:24
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <CAP7+vJLwKV0BCDuNWF9HAvfLiBLgxJSy5vgsgVnWTSYkTUUNcg@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1520983580.57.0.467229070634.issue33073@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
+1.

On Tue, Mar 13, 2018, 16:26 Tim Peters <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:

>
> Tim Peters <tim@python.org> added the comment:
>
> Thanks, Guido!  I figured I was missing something :-)
>
> It looks like `numbers.Rational` _is_ a "for real" base class of
> `fractions.Fraction`, though, so I'm in favor of supplying a default
> implementation of `.as_integer_ratio()` in `numbers.Rational` anyway.  That
> would make a clear statement of intent, and would do the right thing for
> `Fraction` instances.
>
> ----------
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <https://bugs.python.org/issue33073>
> _______________________________________
>
History
Date User Action Args
2018-03-13 23:43:24gvanrossumsetrecipients: + gvanrossum, tim.peters, rhettinger, mark.dickinson, serhiy.storchaka, Nofar Schnider
2018-03-13 23:43:24gvanrossumlinkissue33073 messages
2018-03-13 23:43:24gvanrossumcreate