Message 313347 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	yselivanov
Recipients	asvetlov, pdxjohnny, r.david.murray, yselivanov
Date	2018-03-06.18:05:57
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1520359557.78.0.467229070634.issue32972@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
I think the right approach would be to add an new base TestCase class: AsyncioTestCase. There other frameworks that have different event loop implementations, so we can't assume that an `async def` test should always be executed by asyncio. And you should use the `asyncio.run` function to run the coroutine.

I think the right approach would be to add an new base TestCase class: AsyncioTestCase.  There other frameworks that have different event loop implementations, so we can't assume that an `async def` test should always be executed by asyncio.

And you should use the `asyncio.run` function to run the coroutine.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2018-03-06 18:05:57	yselivanov	set	recipients: + yselivanov, r.david.murray, asvetlov, pdxjohnny
2018-03-06 18:05:57	yselivanov	set	messageid: <1520359557.78.0.467229070634.issue32972@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2018-03-06 18:05:57	yselivanov	link	issue32972 messages
2018-03-06 18:05:57	yselivanov	create