Message312763
Sorry, I used imprecise language. What you propose is fine.
On Feb 24, 2018 09:54, "Eric V. Smith" <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
>
> Eric V. Smith <eric@trueblade.com> added the comment:
>
> Note that this class (from the test suite) will now raise an exception:
>
> @dataclass(unsafe_hash=True)
> class C:
> i: int
> def __eq__(self, other):
> return self.i == other.i
>
> That's because it has a __hash__, added when __eq__ is defined. I think
> we're better off with the rule being:
>
> If unsafe_hash=True, raise an exception if __hash__ exists and is not
> None. Otherwise add __hash__.
>
> That's how it used to be with hash=True (in 3.70b1).
>
> Or is that what you meant by "but if a __hash__ method is present, an
> exception is raised"? Notice the word "method", instead of attribute.
>
> ----------
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <https://bugs.python.org/issue32929>
> _______________________________________
> |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2018-02-24 22:26:57 | gvanrossum | set | recipients:
+ gvanrossum, eric.smith, ned.deily, steven.daprano |
2018-02-24 22:26:57 | gvanrossum | link | issue32929 messages |
2018-02-24 22:26:57 | gvanrossum | create | |
|