This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author asvetlov
Recipients asvetlov, eli.bendersky, gphemsley, mdk, p-ganssle, scoder, thatiparthy
Date 2017-12-28.22:16:35
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1514499395.08.0.213398074469.issue32424@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
For derivative Python implementation there is a standard strategy: they uses a copy of CPython standard library.

Tthat's why any new module should have a pure Python implementation and that's why https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0399/ exists.

Jython has copy() method as well. IronPython has it. I doubt if an implementation without xml.etree.ElementTree.Element.copy exists at all.

The method removal breaks backward compatibility without a reason, __copy__ alias is valuable and backward compatible change.
History
Date User Action Args
2017-12-28 22:16:35asvetlovsetrecipients: + asvetlov, scoder, eli.bendersky, thatiparthy, mdk, p-ganssle, gphemsley
2017-12-28 22:16:35asvetlovsetmessageid: <1514499395.08.0.213398074469.issue32424@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2017-12-28 22:16:35asvetlovlinkissue32424 messages
2017-12-28 22:16:35asvetlovcreate