This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author __Vano
Recipients Ivan.Pozdeev, __Vano, barry, serhiy.storchaka, xdegaye
Date 2017-12-12.21:28:06
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <cce90246-c574-e744-c38d-2fb968d46507@mail.ru>
In-reply-to <1513069261.93.0.213398074469.issue31643@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
> Xavier de Gaye <xdegaye@gmail.com> added the comment:
>
> On a Samsung device with Android 5.1 and tethering enabled, only one network device has a MAC address and it is not an all-zero MAC address.
>
> Ivan can you please provide more information about this problem: which device, what Android version, what is the output of 'ip link' ?

C:\> ipconfig -all
<...>
Samsung Galaxy S7 - Ethernet адаптер:

         DNS-суффикс этого подключения . . :
         Описание  . . . . . . . . . . . . : Android USB Ethernet/RNDIS
         Физический адрес. . . . . . . . . : 00-00-00-00-00-00
         Dhcp включен. . . . . . . . . . . : да
         Автонастройка включена  . . . . . : да
         IP-адрес  . . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.42.2
         Маска подсети . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
         Основной шлюз . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.42.129
         DHCP-сервер . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.42.129
         DNS-серверы . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.42.129

Device name: Samsung Galaxy S7
Model number: SM-G930F
Android version: 6.0.1
Firmware version: G930FXXU1APGJ
Baseband version: G930VVRS4APH1
Build number: MMB29M.G930VVRU2APG5

> Serhiy Storchaka<storchaka+cpython@gmail.com>  added the comment:
>
> I'm not sure that 000000000000 is better than a random address. Even if an all-zero MAC address is not explicitly prohibited it is used in a multiple independent devices. A random address looks more appropriate fore the purpose of generating a UUID.
The question is not whether it's good UUID source material. The 
question, for the purpose of the test, is whether it's valid getnode() 
output -- which it is for the current logic.
History
Date User Action Args
2017-12-12 21:28:07__Vanosetrecipients: + __Vano, barry, xdegaye, serhiy.storchaka, Ivan.Pozdeev
2017-12-12 21:28:07__Vanolinkissue31643 messages
2017-12-12 21:28:06__Vanocreate