This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author ncoghlan
Recipients berker.peksag, cryvate, eric.araujo, nascheme, ncoghlan, ned.deily, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka, tarek, vstinner
Date 2017-12-03.13:40:49
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1512308449.59.0.213398074469.issue19610@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Prohibiting strings and bytes on the grounds of "Yes they're iterable, but are more likely intended as atomic here, so treat them as ambiguous and refuse to guess" would be fine. (Although I'll also note the classifier case will already fail on upload, since they won't be valid classifiers)

The only part I'm not OK with is upgrading a historically unenforced type restriction that only sometimes causes problems into an eagerly enforced one that breaks currently working code.
History
Date User Action Args
2017-12-03 13:40:49ncoghlansetrecipients: + ncoghlan, nascheme, pitrou, vstinner, tarek, ned.deily, eric.araujo, berker.peksag, serhiy.storchaka, cryvate
2017-12-03 13:40:49ncoghlansetmessageid: <1512308449.59.0.213398074469.issue19610@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2017-12-03 13:40:49ncoghlanlinkissue19610 messages
2017-12-03 13:40:49ncoghlancreate