Author skrah
Recipients benjamin.peterson, brett.cannon, cryvate, gvanrossum, ncoghlan, serhiy.storchaka, skrah, yselivanov
Date 2017-11-14.13:43:30
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <20171114134320.GA14749@bytereef.org>
In-reply-to <1510666312.8.0.213398074469.issue32012@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 01:31:52PM +0000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> If limited to the original scope, this isn't a new special case, it's fixing a bug in the implementation of the existing special case (where it's ignoring the trailing comma when it shouldn't be).

This ignores the trailing comma:

    f([1,2,3],)

And this:

    f(x for x in [1,2,3],)

Seems logical to me.

Do you want to allow the 1,2 to be read as a tuple?

   f(x for x in 1,2)
History
Date User Action Args
2017-11-14 13:43:30skrahsetrecipients: + skrah, gvanrossum, brett.cannon, ncoghlan, benjamin.peterson, serhiy.storchaka, yselivanov, cryvate
2017-11-14 13:43:30skrahlinkissue32012 messages
2017-11-14 13:43:30skrahcreate