➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author pitrou
Recipients Birne94, Connor.Wolf, Giovanni.Bajo, Winterflower, bobbyi, dan.oreilly, davin, emptysquare, forest_atq, gregory.p.smith, ionelmc, jcea, lesha, neologix, nirai, nirs, pitrou, sbt, sdaoden, tshepang, vinay.sajip, vstinner
Date 2017-10-21.17:12:00
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1508605920.46.0.213398074469.issue6721@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
Oh, I forgot that IO buffered objects also have a lock.  So we would have to special-case those as well, unless we take the generic approach...

A problem with the generic approach is that it would leave higher-level synchronization objects such as RLock, Event etc. in an inconsistent state.  Not to mention the case where the lock is taken by the thread calling fork()...
History
Date User Action Args
2017-10-21 17:12:00pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, gregory.p.smith, vinay.sajip, jcea, nirs, vstinner, nirai, forest_atq, ionelmc, bobbyi, neologix, Giovanni.Bajo, sdaoden, tshepang, sbt, lesha, emptysquare, dan.oreilly, davin, Connor.Wolf, Winterflower, Birne94
2017-10-21 17:12:00pitrousetmessageid: <1508605920.46.0.213398074469.issue6721@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2017-10-21 17:12:00pitroulinkissue6721 messages
2017-10-21 17:12:00pitroucreate