This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author hawkowl
Recipients dstufft, gvanrossum, hawkowl, ncoghlan, r.david.murray, serhiy.storchaka
Date 2017-10-10.13:05:35
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1507640735.38.0.213398074469.issue31742@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
So you're proposing a coordinated effort across the half dozen, possibly more, test runners to enable some flags, so CPython doesn't log a single message, possibly two, that you're using unsupported experimental software with no backwards compatibility guarantee?

I think the warnings control setting there could be a good solution for your "I don't care, don't show the warning" use case, but I also think explicit disabling per module is a better solution to recommend to users (since we might know that we're using typing, and we say "we are okay with using typing", but might not realise that we're silencing a new provisional module used by an updated library sometime in the future).
History
Date User Action Args
2017-10-10 13:05:35hawkowlsetrecipients: + hawkowl, gvanrossum, ncoghlan, r.david.murray, serhiy.storchaka, dstufft
2017-10-10 13:05:35hawkowlsetmessageid: <1507640735.38.0.213398074469.issue31742@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2017-10-10 13:05:35hawkowllinkissue31742 messages
2017-10-10 13:05:35hawkowlcreate