Author RufusVS
Recipients RufusVS, docs@python, r.david.murray, rhettinger, zach.ware
Date 2017-10-02.00:37:17
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <083A0A3B-598B-4399-A246-DFC4B7D31F36@gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1468260642.45.0.0477478332119.issue27484@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
I happened to run across this in my old email inbox.

It's embarrassing to realize how wrong I was in submitting the report.

Reading it with fresh eyes, your original makes sense.

I don't know what I was thinking.

> On Jul 11, 2016, at 2:10 PM, Raymond Hettinger <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> Raymond Hettinger added the comment:
> 
> I think all of these read fine as-is though I would change "argument first" to  "first argument" or just "argument".   Adding the word "positional" is a distractor from what the comments are trying to communicate.
> 
> The version numbering is normally done with a directive and outside of the examples.
> 
> ----------
> nosy: +rhettinger
> 
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue27484>
> _______________________________________
History
Date User Action Args
2017-10-02 00:37:19RufusVSsetrecipients: + RufusVS, rhettinger, r.david.murray, docs@python, zach.ware
2017-10-02 00:37:19RufusVSlinkissue27484 messages
2017-10-02 00:37:18RufusVScreate