This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author bob.ippolito
Recipients
Date 2006-10-16.23:57:09
SpamBayes Score
Marked as misclassified
Message-id
In-reply-to
Content
Logged In: YES 
user_id=139309

The flush strategy is a silly thing to rattle on about.

The idea is just to pick a cache size that's big enough that
any sane application will never have to flush it. The
current cache size is plenty big enough for anything I threw
at it. If there's an application out there that needs a
bigger cache I'd like to see it, and then perhaps we could
adjust the size in some minor release to accommodate it.

A FIFO is probably a bad strategy because there are a lot of
common structs that are used a lot (the ones with just a few
characters).

If there was an obviously better solution here, surely it
would have already been proposed or implemented for the re
module.
History
Date User Action Args
2007-08-23 14:43:37adminlinkissue1573394 messages
2007-08-23 14:43:37admincreate