Message30190
Logged In: YES
user_id=139309
The flush strategy is a silly thing to rattle on about.
The idea is just to pick a cache size that's big enough that
any sane application will never have to flush it. The
current cache size is plenty big enough for anything I threw
at it. If there's an application out there that needs a
bigger cache I'd like to see it, and then perhaps we could
adjust the size in some minor release to accommodate it.
A FIFO is probably a bad strategy because there are a lot of
common structs that are used a lot (the ones with just a few
characters).
If there was an obviously better solution here, surely it
would have already been proposed or implemented for the re
module. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2007-08-23 14:43:37 | admin | link | issue1573394 messages |
2007-08-23 14:43:37 | admin | create | |
|