Author lazka
Recipients Jelle Zijlstra, eric.smith, giampaolo.rodola, gvanrossum, inada.naoki, lazka, ncoghlan, pitrou, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner, xiang.zhang
Date 2017-07-18.10:53:41
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1500375221.13.0.139110490736.issue28638@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Why not just do the following:

>>> from collections import namedtuple
>>> Point = namedtuple('Point', ['x', 'y'])
>>> Point._source
"from collections import namedtuple\nPoint = namedtuple('Point', ['x', 'y'])\n"
>>> 

The docs make it seems as if the primary use case of the _source attribute is
to serialize the definition. Returning a source which produces a class with
different performance/memory characteristics goes against that.
History
Date User Action Args
2017-07-18 10:53:41lazkasetrecipients: + lazka, gvanrossum, rhettinger, ncoghlan, pitrou, vstinner, eric.smith, giampaolo.rodola, inada.naoki, serhiy.storchaka, xiang.zhang, Jelle Zijlstra
2017-07-18 10:53:41lazkasetmessageid: <1500375221.13.0.139110490736.issue28638@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2017-07-18 10:53:41lazkalinkissue28638 messages
2017-07-18 10:53:41lazkacreate