This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author vstinner
Recipients belopolsky, martin.panter, musically_ut, r.david.murray, serhiy.storchaka, tim.peters, vstinner
Date 2017-07-03.11:10:01
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <>
Alexander: "Sorry for being late to the discussion, but please allow me to add a -1 vote."

While I agree that seconds=28747 is not perfect, IMHO "datetime.timedelta(seconds=28747)" is an enhancement over "datetime.timedelta(0, 28747)".

Can't we make small enhanements step by step, rather than each time try to redesign datetime? ;-)

(Yeah, datetime is now perfect, but well, it's now widely used and part of the stdlib!)
Date User Action Args
2017-07-03 11:10:01vstinnersetrecipients: + vstinner, tim.peters, belopolsky, r.david.murray, martin.panter, serhiy.storchaka, musically_ut
2017-07-03 11:10:01vstinnersetmessageid: <>
2017-07-03 11:10:01vstinnerlinkissue30302 messages
2017-07-03 11:10:01vstinnercreate