➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author Jim.Jewett
Recipients Jim.Jewett, asksol, davin, pitrou
Date 2017-06-12.14:02:03
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <CA+OGgf4VJxvhaKQ0=uoigiF+xjmt+esBsE7kPLCAmVv5uCqV-g@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1497251751.07.0.0122653095141.issue30596@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content 
Could join be called in a background thread, or even asynchronously?  That
seems like mixing paradigms, but ...

On Jun 12, 2017 3:15 AM, "Antoine Pitrou" <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:

>
> Antoine Pitrou added the comment:
>
> That's a good question.  close() methods on other objects tend to avoid
> taking an infinite amount of time :-)  But then, Process objects are
> different enough that they don't need to follow that rule.
>
> ----------
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue30596>
> _______________________________________
>
History
Date User Action Args
2017-06-12 14:02:03Jim.Jewettsetrecipients: + Jim.Jewett, pitrou, asksol, davin
2017-06-12 14:02:03Jim.Jewettlinkissue30596 messages
2017-06-12 14:02:03Jim.Jewettcreate