This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author pitrou
Recipients davin, pitrou
Date 2017-06-08.19:29:10
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1496950150.47.0.449760864572.issue30596@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
close() wouldn't terminate the underlying process, so the process would still exist (and wouldn't easily be stoppable from Python anymore) if you were to call close() before terminate() or join().

Perhaps we should instead mandate people call join() before close()?
History
Date User Action Args
2017-06-08 19:29:10pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, davin
2017-06-08 19:29:10pitrousetmessageid: <1496950150.47.0.449760864572.issue30596@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2017-06-08 19:29:10pitroulinkissue30596 messages
2017-06-08 19:29:10pitroucreate