This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author njs
Recipients benjamin.peterson, cgohlke, cstratak, hroncok, jhelmus, larry, mark.dickinson, ned.deily, njs, serhiy.storchaka, skrah, steve.dower
Date 2017-05-10.20:36:59
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1494448619.83.0.69822494013.issue29943@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
@Jonathan: Even 3.6.1 was careful to retain compatibility with code built by 3.6.0. And your proposed 3.6.1-patched will generate binaries equivalent to the ones 3.6.0 generates. So I don't think you need to worry; 3.6.2 is not going to add a new and worse compatibility break, which is what it would take for your proposal to cause a problem. In fact, your 3.6.1-patched is equivalent to what I think 3.6.2 should do. I say go for it; patching 3.6.1 seems like a good solution.
History
Date User Action Args
2017-05-10 20:36:59njssetrecipients: + njs, mark.dickinson, larry, benjamin.peterson, ned.deily, cgohlke, skrah, serhiy.storchaka, steve.dower, cstratak, hroncok, jhelmus
2017-05-10 20:36:59njssetmessageid: <1494448619.83.0.69822494013.issue29943@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2017-05-10 20:36:59njslinkissue29943 messages
2017-05-10 20:36:59njscreate