Message293452
@Jonathan: Even 3.6.1 was careful to retain compatibility with code built by 3.6.0. And your proposed 3.6.1-patched will generate binaries equivalent to the ones 3.6.0 generates. So I don't think you need to worry; 3.6.2 is not going to add a new and worse compatibility break, which is what it would take for your proposal to cause a problem. In fact, your 3.6.1-patched is equivalent to what I think 3.6.2 should do. I say go for it; patching 3.6.1 seems like a good solution. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2017-05-10 20:36:59 | njs | set | recipients:
+ njs, mark.dickinson, larry, benjamin.peterson, ned.deily, cgohlke, skrah, serhiy.storchaka, steve.dower, cstratak, hroncok, jhelmus |
2017-05-10 20:36:59 | njs | set | messageid: <1494448619.83.0.69822494013.issue29943@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2017-05-10 20:36:59 | njs | link | issue29943 messages |
2017-05-10 20:36:59 | njs | create | |
|