➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author martin.panter
Recipients berker.peksag, brett.cannon, ezio.melotti, josh.r, martin.panter, ned.deily, python-dev, vlee, vstinner, willingc, yan12125, zach.ware
Date 2017-04-22.00:17:34
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1492820256.03.0.718052405844.issue23404@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
Last time I proposed removing the automatic rebuilding of checked-in generated files, it seemed getting a consensus would not be trivial. Nick seemed strongly against changing the status quo: <https://mail-archive.com/search?l=mid&q=CADiSq7d2NV0hbcQB1bYvc9M2qUYZiYC7RsG=fnw7tdWia2YmQg@mail.gmail.com>. He did say it has been too hard to remember how to rebuild generated files in the past.

Documenting the quirks of the build system would be good even if we keep the automatic regeneration.
History
Date User Action Args
2017-04-22 00:17:36martin.pantersetrecipients: + martin.panter, brett.cannon, vstinner, ned.deily, ezio.melotti, python-dev, berker.peksag, zach.ware, willingc, josh.r, vlee, yan12125
2017-04-22 00:17:36martin.pantersetmessageid: <1492820256.03.0.718052405844.issue23404@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2017-04-22 00:17:35martin.panterlinkissue23404 messages
2017-04-22 00:17:34martin.pantercreate