Author vstinner
Recipients ezio.melotti, malin, terry.reedy, vstinner, xiang.zhang
Date 2017-04-08.02:32:41
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <CAMpsgwbQQhczhJLo_wfSK4tqoh+map7jTOHUWa+iWZujkj235w@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1491600928.6.0.244195384242.issue30003@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
"But for any codec, there might be archives, even if the codec is not
used for new files."

The bug is in the encoder. The codec is still usable to *decode*
files. So maybe a few people use it but didn't notice the encoder bug?
History
Date User Action Args
2017-04-08 02:32:42vstinnersetrecipients: + vstinner, terry.reedy, ezio.melotti, malin, xiang.zhang
2017-04-08 02:32:42vstinnerlinkissue30003 messages
2017-04-08 02:32:41vstinnercreate