This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author vstinner
Recipients metathink, vstinner, yselivanov
Date 2017-03-28.12:47:06
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1490705226.39.0.069430439636.issue29930@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
I understood that:

* code fills the write buffer of the transport until writing is paused because of the high water mark
* a function calls drain() which waits until the server reads until packets to reduce the size of the write buffer
* a second function calls drain(), but the first function is already waiting on drain(): bug occurs since the code doesn't support having two coroutines waiting on drain() in parallel

Notes:

* the minimum is to document that drain() must not be called twice in parallel. Right now, nothing is said about that:
https://docs.python.org/dev/library/asyncio-stream.html#asyncio.StreamWriter.drain

* we can probably design something to allow to have multiple coroutines waiting on the same event

--

Metathink told me that he got the bug on a much more complex code using websockets. Thank you Metathink for isolating the bug to a few lines of Python code with simpler asyncio functions!
History
Date User Action Args
2017-03-28 12:47:06vstinnersetrecipients: + vstinner, yselivanov, metathink
2017-03-28 12:47:06vstinnersetmessageid: <1490705226.39.0.069430439636.issue29930@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2017-03-28 12:47:06vstinnerlinkissue29930 messages
2017-03-28 12:47:06vstinnercreate