Message290704
I understood that:
* code fills the write buffer of the transport until writing is paused because of the high water mark
* a function calls drain() which waits until the server reads until packets to reduce the size of the write buffer
* a second function calls drain(), but the first function is already waiting on drain(): bug occurs since the code doesn't support having two coroutines waiting on drain() in parallel
Notes:
* the minimum is to document that drain() must not be called twice in parallel. Right now, nothing is said about that:
https://docs.python.org/dev/library/asyncio-stream.html#asyncio.StreamWriter.drain
* we can probably design something to allow to have multiple coroutines waiting on the same event
--
Metathink told me that he got the bug on a much more complex code using websockets. Thank you Metathink for isolating the bug to a few lines of Python code with simpler asyncio functions! |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2017-03-28 12:47:06 | vstinner | set | recipients:
+ vstinner, yselivanov, metathink |
2017-03-28 12:47:06 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1490705226.39.0.069430439636.issue29930@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2017-03-28 12:47:06 | vstinner | link | issue29930 messages |
2017-03-28 12:47:06 | vstinner | create | |
|