Message289905
In issue #29540 there was a suggestion to add a `compact` argument to json.dump() and json.dumps(). That was eventually rejected as adding complexity to an API that's already messy.
But in GH-72 someone created a COMPACT constant to the json module which gets a similar effect as a `compact` argument but without expanding any APIs. Unfortunately I think the constant proposal got lost in discussion of adding the `compact` argument, so I'm opening a new issue to make a final decision as to whether we should accept/reject the COMPACT constant idea. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2017-03-20 22:33:19 | brett.cannon | set | recipients:
+ brett.cannon, rhettinger, ezio.melotti |
2017-03-20 22:33:19 | brett.cannon | set | messageid: <1490049199.07.0.61664177999.issue29863@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2017-03-20 22:33:18 | brett.cannon | link | issue29863 messages |
2017-03-20 22:33:18 | brett.cannon | create | |
|