Message289728
That issue seems to have stalled as it seems to have focussed on low-level APIs, and also because it is proposing a new module with the API question that entails.
Another possible stance is that os.fork() should be left as-is, as a low-level primitive, and this functionality should be provided by the higher-level multiprocessing module. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2017-03-16 19:01:00 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, njs, sbt, yselivanov, davin |
2017-03-16 19:01:00 | pitrou | set | messageid: <1489690860.56.0.063919497429.issue29828@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2017-03-16 19:01:00 | pitrou | link | issue29828 messages |
2017-03-16 19:01:00 | pitrou | create | |
|