Message 289141 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	fafhrd91
Recipients	fafhrd91, gvanrossum, r.david.murray, yselivanov
Date	2017-03-06.22:49:12
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1488840552.13.0.88785037889.issue29742@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
get_extra_info() returns optional transport information, I think it is ok to return None for closed transport. https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/master/Lib/asyncio/transports.py#L18 I propose this feature initially, during early tulip development but now I think it is not good api.

get_extra_info() returns optional transport information, I think it is ok to return None for closed transport.
https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/master/Lib/asyncio/transports.py#L18

I propose this feature initially, during early tulip development
but now I think it is not good api.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2017-03-06 22:49:12	fafhrd91	set	recipients: + fafhrd91, gvanrossum, r.david.murray, yselivanov
2017-03-06 22:49:12	fafhrd91	set	messageid: <1488840552.13.0.88785037889.issue29742@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2017-03-06 22:49:12	fafhrd91	link	issue29742 messages
2017-03-06 22:49:12	fafhrd91	create