Author dsoprea
Recipients Vladimir Feinberg, Winterflower, davin, dsoprea, sbt
Date 2017-02-14.17:34:37
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1487093678.66.0.928533126063.issue19675@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
I don't think this can be tested. Throwing exceptions in the remote process causes exceptions that can't be caught in the same way (when the initializer fails the pool just attempts to recreate the process over and over) and I don't think it'd be acceptable to try to spawn too many processes in order to induce the original problem. There's not a lot of surface area to what we've doing here. We can't simulate failures any other way.

Can I get an agreement on this from someone?
History
Date User Action Args
2017-02-14 17:34:38dsopreasetrecipients: + dsoprea, sbt, davin, Winterflower, Vladimir Feinberg
2017-02-14 17:34:38dsopreasetmessageid: <1487093678.66.0.928533126063.issue19675@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2017-02-14 17:34:38dsoprealinkissue19675 messages
2017-02-14 17:34:37dsopreacreate