Message287267
Hi all,
Here are the test I've made to understand the behavior :
class Foo_42(object):
def __contains__(self,item): return 42
class Foo_neg(object):
def __contains__(self,item): return -42
class Foo_None(object):
def __contains__(self,item): return
class Foo_false(object):
def __contains__(self,item): return False
class Foo_true(object):
def __contains__(self,item): return True
for foo in [Foo_false(),Foo_None(),Foo_neg(),Foo_true(),Foo_42()]:
print("3 in foo:" + str(3 in foo))
print("foo.__contains__(3)" + str(foo.__contains__(3)))
which output this :
3 in foo:False
foo.__contains__(3)False
3 in foo:False
foo.__contains__(3)None
3 in foo:True
foo.__contains__(3)-42
3 in foo:True
foo.__contains__(3)True
3 in foo:True
foo.__contains__(3)42
So as long as __contains__ return False or None, the 'in' operator will be False. Otherwise true. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2017-02-08 01:25:06 | Eric Lafontaine | set | recipients:
+ Eric Lafontaine, mark.dickinson, vstinner, christian.heimes, ezio.melotti, r.david.murray, docs@python, nparikh |
2017-02-08 01:25:05 | Eric Lafontaine | set | messageid: <1486517105.06.0.812064615771.issue16011@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2017-02-08 01:25:04 | Eric Lafontaine | link | issue16011 messages |
2017-02-08 01:25:03 | Eric Lafontaine | create | |
|