Message287252
If Path.rename() were made to be slightly more than a wrapper around os.rename(), then any future changes to the return value of os.rename() could be taken into consideration in the return value of Path.rename(). I don't see how anything would become impossible then.
Creating the destination Path object explicitly is my solution right now. Since it had become such a pattern in my code, I figured it could be delegated up to the level of the Path object and make for cleaner looking code. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2017-02-07 19:04:49 | Walter Szeliga | set | recipients:
+ Walter Szeliga, brett.cannon, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka |
2017-02-07 19:04:49 | Walter Szeliga | set | messageid: <1486494289.89.0.725061651268.issue29425@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2017-02-07 19:04:49 | Walter Szeliga | link | issue29425 messages |
2017-02-07 19:04:49 | Walter Szeliga | create | |
|