Message 286434 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	martin.panter
Recipients	christian.heimes, facundobatista, mark.dickinson, martin.panter, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, steven.daprano
Date	2017-01-29.08:23:05
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1485678185.45.0.74340746494.issue18842@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
FWIW, here is an attempt to add Argument Clinic to the Objects/floatobject.c and Objects/longobject.c implementations: https://bugs.python.org/file33943/issue20185_conglomerate_v4.diff https://bugs.python.org/file33989/clinic_longobject_v3.patch If the methods are rejected, the dead code should be removed to avoid wasting people’s time. Why do you name the methods is_finite() etc with underscores, when the existing methods math.isfinite() etc do not have underscores? Seems it would add unnecessary confusion.

FWIW, here is an attempt to add Argument Clinic to the Objects/floatobject.c and Objects/longobject.c implementations:

https://bugs.python.org/file33943/issue20185_conglomerate_v4.diff
https://bugs.python.org/file33989/clinic_longobject_v3.patch

If the methods are rejected, the dead code should be removed to avoid wasting people’s time.

Why do you name the methods is_finite() etc with underscores, when the existing methods math.isfinite() etc do not have underscores? Seems it would add unnecessary confusion.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2017-01-29 08:23:05	martin.panter	set	recipients: + martin.panter, rhettinger, facundobatista, mark.dickinson, christian.heimes, steven.daprano, serhiy.storchaka
2017-01-29 08:23:05	martin.panter	set	messageid: <1485678185.45.0.74340746494.issue18842@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2017-01-29 08:23:05	martin.panter	link	issue18842 messages
2017-01-29 08:23:05	martin.panter	create