➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author Jim Fasarakis-Hilliard
Recipients Jim Fasarakis-Hilliard, docs@python, marco.buttu
Date 2017-01-27.17:34:15
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1485538455.75.0.934212559549.issue29371@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
I think it is fine as it is but, agree that it could be clearer. I'm simply not experienced enough to know if this change is warranted. 

The docs generally do a great job in being concise (balancing brevity and completeness). A core-dev would be best to judge if brevity should be sacrificed for more complete and clear wording here. 

I suggest waiting to see if any core-dev replies and, if no replies come in after a while, close it.
History
Date User Action Args
2017-01-27 17:34:15Jim Fasarakis-Hilliardsetrecipients: + Jim Fasarakis-Hilliard, docs@python, marco.buttu
2017-01-27 17:34:15Jim Fasarakis-Hilliardsetmessageid: <1485538455.75.0.934212559549.issue29371@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2017-01-27 17:34:15Jim Fasarakis-Hilliardlinkissue29371 messages
2017-01-27 17:34:15Jim Fasarakis-Hilliardcreate