Message286340
I presume this is the same as in Issue 18543 (and a few other duplicates). Let me know if I got it wrong.
IMO there is no easy fix. The best solution may be to just document the behaviour as a limitation of the API, and design a new/improved API for the future (Py 3.7+) that handles these cases. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2017-01-27 00:21:39 | martin.panter | set | recipients:
+ martin.panter, piotr.dobrogost |
2017-01-27 00:21:38 | martin.panter | set | messageid: <1485476498.98.0.648777621046.issue29379@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2017-01-27 00:21:38 | martin.panter | link | issue29379 messages |
2017-01-27 00:21:38 | martin.panter | create | |
|