Author doughellmann
Recipients bkabrda, christian.heimes, dholth, dmalcolm, doughellmann, jpokorny, lukecarrier, pitrou, rbcollins, rpetrov
Date 2017-01-17.13:54:40
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <>
@rbcollins, I don't think providing a hashlib.fips module without md5() solves the problem. The idea is to have a way to call md5() in non-secure situations, and to signal to the FIPS system that the call is OK. A separate module would work if it included an md5() function that always did that signaling. But creating a separate module just to wrap one function like that seems like overkill, doesn't it?
Date User Action Args
2017-01-17 13:54:40doughellmannsetrecipients: + doughellmann, pitrou, christian.heimes, rbcollins, rpetrov, dmalcolm, dholth, jpokorny, bkabrda, lukecarrier
2017-01-17 13:54:40doughellmannsetmessageid: <>
2017-01-17 13:54:40doughellmannlinkissue9216 messages
2017-01-17 13:54:40doughellmanncreate