This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author christian.heimes
Recipients christian.heimes, martin.panter, serhiy.storchaka, xdegaye, xiang.zhang, zach.ware
Date 2016-12-16.18:49:59
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <>
In-reply-to <>
A larger limit is totally fine. The check protects against DoS with hundreds of MB.

I'm currently travelling and won't be available much until next week.

Am 16. Dezember 2016 19:37:03 MEZ, schrieb Xiang Zhang <>:
>Xiang Zhang added the comment:
>Xavier's plan sounds good. We could increase the line length limitation
>to 64K and add another limitation of the maximum lines a multi-line
>block could contain. Any limitation is violated the connection is
>refused. This situation seems quite similar to
>http.client.parse_headers, which doesn't get a standard length
>limitation or number limitation either.
>nosy: +xiang.zhang
>Python tracker <>
Date User Action Args
2016-12-16 18:50:00christian.heimessetrecipients: + christian.heimes, xdegaye, martin.panter, zach.ware, serhiy.storchaka, xiang.zhang
2016-12-16 18:50:00christian.heimeslinkissue28971 messages
2016-12-16 18:49:59christian.heimescreate