Message283425
A larger limit is totally fine. The check protects against DoS with hundreds of MB.
I'm currently travelling and won't be available much until next week.
Am 16. Dezember 2016 19:37:03 MEZ, schrieb Xiang Zhang <report@bugs.python.org>:
>
>Xiang Zhang added the comment:
>
>Xavier's plan sounds good. We could increase the line length limitation
>to 64K and add another limitation of the maximum lines a multi-line
>block could contain. Any limitation is violated the connection is
>refused. This situation seems quite similar to
>http.client.parse_headers, which doesn't get a standard length
>limitation or number limitation either.
>
>----------
>nosy: +xiang.zhang
>
>_______________________________________
>Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
><http://bugs.python.org/issue28971>
>_______________________________________ |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2016-12-16 18:50:00 | christian.heimes | set | recipients:
+ christian.heimes, xdegaye, martin.panter, zach.ware, serhiy.storchaka, xiang.zhang |
2016-12-16 18:50:00 | christian.heimes | link | issue28971 messages |
2016-12-16 18:49:59 | christian.heimes | create | |
|