Message282385
That was my initial preference. Mainly because this doesn't add code churn.
But I don't understand how PyObject_CallFunctionObjArgs() that uses _PyObject_CallArg1() and has many local variables can consume less stack than _PyObject_CallArg1() itself. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2016-12-05 06:06:17 | serhiy.storchaka | set | recipients:
+ serhiy.storchaka, vstinner, python-dev |
2016-12-05 06:06:17 | serhiy.storchaka | set | messageid: <1480917977.2.0.329959927709.issue28858@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2016-12-05 06:06:17 | serhiy.storchaka | link | issue28858 messages |
2016-12-05 06:06:16 | serhiy.storchaka | create | |
|