This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author serhiy.storchaka
Recipients python-dev, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner
Date 2016-12-05.06:06:16
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1480917977.2.0.329959927709.issue28858@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
That was my initial preference. Mainly because this doesn't add code churn.

But I don't understand how PyObject_CallFunctionObjArgs() that uses _PyObject_CallArg1() and has many local variables can consume less stack than _PyObject_CallArg1() itself.
History
Date User Action Args
2016-12-05 06:06:17serhiy.storchakasetrecipients: + serhiy.storchaka, vstinner, python-dev
2016-12-05 06:06:17serhiy.storchakasetmessageid: <1480917977.2.0.329959927709.issue28858@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2016-12-05 06:06:17serhiy.storchakalinkissue28858 messages
2016-12-05 06:06:16serhiy.storchakacreate