This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author vstinner
Recipients mark.dickinson, martin.panter, rhettinger, vstinner, wolma
Date 2016-11-14.12:18:19
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <>
> This requires quite a bit of work though for a relatively minor improvement so do you think it's worth the effort ?

If you factorize code of unit tests, I expect better tests and more tests, so yes, it's valuable.

But since this issue is old (no activity last 2 years), I close the issue.

Please come back with a reviewable patch (reopen the issue, or open a new one, it's up to you), so it will be easier to discuss. The patch doesn't have to be complete, you can start by factorizing a single function just to discuss the principle and then complete the patch.

Note: I added our fractions experts to the issue while closing it :-)
Date User Action Args
2016-11-14 12:18:19vstinnersetrecipients: + vstinner, rhettinger, mark.dickinson, martin.panter, wolma
2016-11-14 12:18:19vstinnersetmessageid: <>
2016-11-14 12:18:19vstinnerlinkissue22495 messages
2016-11-14 12:18:19vstinnercreate