Message276913
Yes, I saw that. If a function could raise a NoCache exception, re._compile() could take advantage of it. But I don't feel good about going down that path (adding coupling between the caching decorator and the cached function). It would be better to keep the lru_cache API simple. I already made the mistake of expanding the API for typed=True just to accommodate a single use case (re.compile). |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2016-09-18 21:07:48 | rhettinger | set | recipients:
+ rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka |
2016-09-18 21:07:48 | rhettinger | set | messageid: <1474232868.04.0.779898325864.issue28193@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2016-09-18 21:07:48 | rhettinger | link | issue28193 messages |
2016-09-18 21:07:48 | rhettinger | create | |
|