This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author kxroberto
Recipients
Date 2006-02-06.10:29:18
SpamBayes Score
Marked as misclassified
Message-id
In-reply-to
Content
Logged In: YES 
user_id=972995

> http://python.org/sf/549151

the analyzation of the browsers is right. lynx is best ok to
ask.
But urllibX is not a browser (application) but a lib: As of
now with standard urllibX error handling you cannot code a lynx.

gvr's initial suggestion to raise a clear error (with
redirection-link as attribute of the exception value) is
best ok. Another option would be to simly yield the
undirected stub HTML and leave the 30X-code (and redirection
LOCATION in header).

To redirect POST as GET _while_ simply loosing (!) the data
(and not appending it to the GET-URL) is most bad for a lib.
Transcribing smart a short formlike POST to a GET w QUERY
would be so la la.
Don't know if the MS & netscape's also transpose to GET with
long data? ...

The current behaviour is most worst of all 4. All other
methods whould at least have raisen an early hint/error in
my case.
History
Date User Action Args
2007-08-23 14:37:39adminlinkissue1424148 messages
2007-08-23 14:37:39admincreate